A Graph of New Dreamwidth Users by Year
Jan. 22nd, 2025 03:09 pm![[personal profile]](https://www.dreamwidth.org/img/silk/identity/user.png)
![[community profile]](https://www.dreamwidth.org/img/silk/identity/community.png)
I was curious about how many people actually use Dreamwidth, and I found a lovely stats page that shows how many users have joined on every day the site has existed. I love the transparency!
So I downloaded the data into Excel and made this graph:

Thoughts on the decline of new users joining? Has anyone noticed a dropoff in traffic? Are people concerned or is having a larger user base not much of a priority for those of us who like our quiet internet corners? I personally would love to see Dreamwidth have more users and be more active.
The platform has limitations of course; many users these days don't want to use HTML or have to self-host their images. And while I understand the reasoning for not having an app, it's probably a limit to drawing in new users as well. I wonder what, if anything, it would take for this site to actually grow it's user base instead of maintaining/losing users year over year. I'm also not sure if the owners actually want growth either. There's something to be said, of course, for a business model built on sustainability rather than growth. I guess I'm just putting this out there to hear if anyone else has thoughts or concerns about the number of people on the platform.
I crossposted this from my own journal. I hope that's ok.
So I downloaded the data into Excel and made this graph:

Thoughts on the decline of new users joining? Has anyone noticed a dropoff in traffic? Are people concerned or is having a larger user base not much of a priority for those of us who like our quiet internet corners? I personally would love to see Dreamwidth have more users and be more active.
The platform has limitations of course; many users these days don't want to use HTML or have to self-host their images. And while I understand the reasoning for not having an app, it's probably a limit to drawing in new users as well. I wonder what, if anything, it would take for this site to actually grow it's user base instead of maintaining/losing users year over year. I'm also not sure if the owners actually want growth either. There's something to be said, of course, for a business model built on sustainability rather than growth. I guess I'm just putting this out there to hear if anyone else has thoughts or concerns about the number of people on the platform.
I crossposted this from my own journal. I hope that's ok.
no subject
Date: 2025-01-23 04:00 am (UTC)Interesting graph -- thanks for sharing!
I'm curious about activity. Like many others (it would seem), I created my account in 2009 but treated it as a mirror for some years until the LJ fiasco (that's the spike in 2017). A plot of when people made, say, their fifth native DW posts could have a different shape. (I'm picking fifth semi-arbitrarily -- basically skipping the first couple "is this thing on?" posts that newcomers sometimes make.)
no subject
Date: 2025-01-23 08:00 am (UTC)Oh, I was wondering what happened in 2017! I moved across in 2009, and pretty much never went back to LJ. I'd say that those spikes are not representative of ongoing users, because I know each time LJ did something, more of my friends would move over, and many of those friends who had been active LJ users are ghost accounts. I reckon I've been acquiring new friends here at a steady rate, and whether or not they are active isn't strongly correlated with when they got their account (some of my long term friends have gone either dormant or almost entirely to private journalling)
no subject
Date: 2025-01-23 01:30 pm (UTC)no subject
Date: 2025-01-23 03:37 pm (UTC)I think the core problem with any migration (I've seen this elsewhere too) is that communities don't migrate, they fragment. People get fed up with the old platform at different times, not all at once. When you get fed up, you'll look at the current state of a new candidate -- if most of your friends aren't there either, then you might go looking for a third option or just find other things to fill your free time. Most people do not want to build again from scratch; they want to fit into something that's already there. I've seen this with several platforms, including LJ, Twitter, and Stack Overflow, and it can be really hard to get people to re-assemble in a new place. It's frustrating!
no subject
Date: 2025-01-23 03:43 pm (UTC)So well put! And very unfortunately true. I guess the best we can do is just find a place that works well enough and hope that people make there way there (here lol) eventually.
no subject
Date: 2025-01-24 01:51 pm (UTC)I think that a lot of them moved more strongly to facebook, which wasn't a pit of snakes at the time. Some of them are still doing long form blog type posts on facebook, which I find really weird.
no subject
Date: 2025-01-23 03:31 pm (UTC)LJ secretly moved its servers to Moscow late in 2016 -- I think it was in the week between Christmas and New Year's, when fewer people would probably be around to notice, though correlation != causation so who knows if that's why -- but the big debacle there with "here are new terms of service, in Russian, which you must accept to proceed" was a few months later, in the spring of 2017. A few of my friends moved to DW when it opened up in 2009, a few more moved after the server thing, and a lot more moved when those new TOS hit. Anecdotes are not data, but I suspect this was a broader pattern.
What I saw in my small circle is that the people who came here in 2009 "staked territory", so to speak -- grabbed the user name to establish presence and start finding each other on DW -- but people were mirroring LJ to here for a while, still treating LJ as primary because that's where most of the people still were. Migrations are hard; people want to be where their friends are, but groups don't move all at once.
no subject
Date: 2025-01-23 03:46 pm (UTC)I don't know the history behind livejournal's ownership honestly, but I know there are a lot of strict rules/sanctions about how Russian companies can do business with international users. I've seen other software that has been forced to ban users with Russian forms of payment, so perhaps they were forced to move if their former hosting company was unable to continue to provide services.
no subject
Date: 2025-01-24 01:54 pm (UTC)Oh, I vaguely recall that bit of kerfuffle. It might have been the point that I deleted my LJ, although it is also possible I'd done that some time before, because the acquisition by ?Six Apart made me quite concerned. And yes, having also been here since 2009, I watched a lot of people mirror, and then very slowly either shift, or drift away.
But also, a lot of people had left LJ by the time that DW became an option. Many of us were experimenting with InsaneJournal and, hmm, whatever the other LJ clones were called (I'm pretty sure that DW was my third attempt to move away from the LJ ecosystem). Which isn't so much talking about the pattern with DW, but agreeing with what you've said upthread, about the fragmentation of the communities.
no subject
Date: 2025-01-23 01:24 pm (UTC)But yeah, new accounts vs active accounts is a VERY different metric. I would love it if I could have access to that kind of data over a long timeframe.
Edit: I just looked it up and the tumblr drama was in 2018/19 so yeah that must have been LJ. Makes sense actually, given the similarity of the platforms (DW and LJ) vs how foreign a tumblr user would feel coming here.