Dreamwidth feature polls
Apr. 20th, 2009 07:16 pm![[personal profile]](https://www.dreamwidth.org/img/silk/identity/user.png)
![[community profile]](https://www.dreamwidth.org/img/silk/identity/community.png)
Because features carry pros and cons and not everyone likes them, each poll question rates them on a sliding scale: -5 means you absolutely detest the feature, -1 means you kind of dislike it, +1 means you kind of like it, zero means you're neutral, and +5 means you absolutely love it. (And, of course, there are in between options too.) If you don't know about a specific feature enough to vote on it, feel free to ask. Remember, you can change your mind on questions--edit your open beta feature answers or edit your planned feature answers!
Spread this around all you like! You can vote in it no matter what you feel about Dreamwidth.
For more information about a feature, or to discuss your feelings about it, please see the following top level comments in this post:
Friends split into access and subscribe
Increased limits on posts and comments
Longer usernames
Journal import, including comments and icons
Built in cross posting
No ads
Invite codes
Improved styles that are more customizable through CSS
Google Analytics for paid users
Better integration with OpenID
Revamped navigation strip
Navigation strip showing a viewer based choice
All users able to create feed accounts
Uploading more than one icon at the same time
A description and comment field for icons
Preview button on comment quick reply
Improved NSFW/adult content warnings, like the ability to add a description
Removal of adult content flagging
A variety of site scheme choices
Ability to link to users on other sites
Respect post cuts in RSS feeds
No word count limit on interests
Added "other" to the gender options
Removal of nudge
Removal of Snap.com popups
Cleaning up of the codebase; ability to run my own installation
Note: I managed to miss one feature in the poll itself, reorganized menu structure.
Friends split into access and subscribe
Mean: 3.29 Median: 4 Std. Dev 2.09
-5 | 3 (1.1%) | |
---|---|---|
-4 | 1 (0.4%) | |
-3 | 3 (1.1%) | |
-2 | 3 (1.1%) | |
-1 | 5 (1.9%) | |
0 | 16 (6.1%) | |
1 | 14 (5.3%) | |
2 | 17 (6.4%) | |
3 | 51 (19.3%) | |
4 | 48 (18.2%) | |
5 | 103 (39.0%) |
Increased limits on posts and comments
Mean: 3.51 Median: 4 Std. Dev 1.72
-5 | 0 (0.0%) | |
---|---|---|
-4 | 0 (0.0%) | |
-3 | 0 (0.0%) | |
-2 | 0 (0.0%) | |
-1 | 1 (0.4%) | |
0 | 28 (10.6%) | |
1 | 14 (5.3%) | |
2 | 20 (7.6%) | |
3 | 48 (18.2%) | |
4 | 35 (13.3%) | |
5 | 118 (44.7%) |
Longer usernames
Mean: 2.15 Median: 2 Std. Dev 2.01
-5 | 1 (0.4%) | |
---|---|---|
-4 | 0 (0.0%) | |
-3 | 2 (0.8%) | |
-2 | 2 (0.8%) | |
-1 | 4 (1.5%) | |
0 | 72 (27.4%) | |
1 | 28 (10.6%) | |
2 | 28 (10.6%) | |
3 | 52 (19.8%) | |
4 | 26 (9.9%) | |
5 | 48 (18.3%) |
Journal import, including comments and icons
Mean: 3.89 Median: 5 Std. Dev 1.78
-5 | 2 (0.8%) | |
---|---|---|
-4 | 0 (0.0%) | |
-3 | 2 (0.8%) | |
-2 | 0 (0.0%) | |
-1 | 1 (0.4%) | |
0 | 16 (6.1%) | |
1 | 5 (1.9%) | |
2 | 16 (6.1%) | |
3 | 36 (13.7%) | |
4 | 31 (11.8%) | |
5 | 154 (58.6%) |
Built in cross posting
Mean: 3.90 Median: 5 Std. Dev 1.64
-5 | 0 (0.0%) | |
---|---|---|
-4 | 0 (0.0%) | |
-3 | 1 (0.4%) | |
-2 | 1 (0.4%) | |
-1 | 1 (0.4%) | |
0 | 18 (6.9%) | |
1 | 10 (3.8%) | |
2 | 10 (3.8%) | |
3 | 33 (12.6%) | |
4 | 40 (15.3%) | |
5 | 147 (56.3%) |
No ads
Mean: 4.51 Median: 5 Std. Dev 1.14
-5 | 0 (0.0%) | |
---|---|---|
-4 | 0 (0.0%) | |
-3 | 0 (0.0%) | |
-2 | 0 (0.0%) | |
-1 | 0 (0.0%) | |
0 | 9 (3.4%) | |
1 | 2 (0.8%) | |
2 | 6 (2.3%) | |
3 | 19 (7.2%) | |
4 | 19 (7.2%) | |
5 | 208 (79.1%) |
Invite codes
Mean: 1.52 Median: 2 Std. Dev 2.16
-5 | 2 (0.8%) | |
---|---|---|
-4 | 3 (1.1%) | |
-3 | 5 (1.9%) | |
-2 | 6 (2.3%) | |
-1 | 17 (6.5%) | |
0 | 74 (28.4%) | |
1 | 20 (7.7%) | |
2 | 37 (14.2%) | |
3 | 45 (17.2%) | |
4 | 26 (10.0%) | |
5 | 26 (10.0%) |
Improved styles that are more customizable through CSS
Mean: 2.87 Median: 3 Std. Dev 1.88
-5 | 0 (0.0%) | |
---|---|---|
-4 | 0 (0.0%) | |
-3 | 0 (0.0%) | |
-2 | 0 (0.0%) | |
-1 | 0 (0.0%) | |
0 | 53 (20.5%) | |
1 | 19 (7.4%) | |
2 | 28 (10.9%) | |
3 | 39 (15.1%) | |
4 | 46 (17.8%) | |
5 | 73 (28.3%) |
Google Analytics for paid users
Mean: 1.19 Median: 0 Std. Dev 2.22
-5 | 3 (1.2%) | |
---|---|---|
-4 | 2 (0.8%) | |
-3 | 8 (3.1%) | |
-2 | 11 (4.3%) | |
-1 | 7 (2.7%) | |
0 | 102 (39.7%) | |
1 | 17 (6.6%) | |
2 | 26 (10.1%) | |
3 | 36 (14.0%) | |
4 | 19 (7.4%) | |
5 | 26 (10.1%) |
Better OpenID integration
Mean: 3.25 Median: 3 Std. Dev 1.69
-5 | 0 (0.0%) | |
---|---|---|
-4 | 1 (0.4%) | |
-3 | 1 (0.4%) | |
-2 | 0 (0.0%) | |
-1 | 0 (0.0%) | |
0 | 24 (9.2%) | |
1 | 11 (4.2%) | |
2 | 37 (14.2%) | |
3 | 60 (23.1%) | |
4 | 43 (16.5%) | |
5 | 83 (31.9%) |
Revamped navigation strip
Mean: 2.27 Median: 2 Std. Dev 1.99
-5 | 2 (0.8%) | |
---|---|---|
-4 | 0 (0.0%) | |
-3 | 2 (0.8%) | |
-2 | 1 (0.4%) | |
-1 | 4 (1.5%) | |
0 | 59 (22.4%) | |
1 | 25 (9.5%) | |
2 | 39 (14.8%) | |
3 | 53 (20.2%) | |
4 | 32 (12.2%) | |
5 | 46 (17.5%) |
Navigation strip showing a viewer based choice
Mean: 3.18 Median: 4 Std. Dev 1.98
-5 | 3 (1.1%) | |
---|---|---|
-4 | 0 (0.0%) | |
-3 | 1 (0.4%) | |
-2 | 0 (0.0%) | |
-1 | 0 (0.0%) | |
0 | 32 (12.3%) | |
1 | 18 (6.9%) | |
2 | 21 (8.0%) | |
3 | 52 (19.9%) | |
4 | 38 (14.6%) | |
5 | 96 (36.8%) |
All users able to create feed accounts
Mean: 2.73 Median: 3 Std. Dev 2.00
-5 | 2 (0.8%) | |
---|---|---|
-4 | 0 (0.0%) | |
-3 | 1 (0.4%) | |
-2 | 0 (0.0%) | |
-1 | 0 (0.0%) | |
0 | 49 (18.8%) | |
1 | 24 (9.2%) | |
2 | 34 (13.0%) | |
3 | 45 (17.2%) | |
4 | 31 (11.9%) | |
5 | 75 (28.7%) |
Uploading more than one icon at the same time
Mean: 3.32 Median: 4 Std. Dev 1.67
-5 | 0 (0.0%) | |
---|---|---|
-4 | 0 (0.0%) | |
-3 | 0 (0.0%) | |
-2 | 0 (0.0%) | |
-1 | 0 (0.0%) | |
0 | 26 (9.9%) | |
1 | 20 (7.6%) | |
2 | 29 (11.0%) | |
3 | 50 (19.0%) | |
4 | 46 (17.5%) | |
5 | 92 (35.0%) |
A description and comment field for icons
Mean: 2.79 Median: 3 Std. Dev 1.89
-5 | 0 (0.0%) | |
---|---|---|
-4 | 0 (0.0%) | |
-3 | 2 (0.8%) | |
-2 | 4 (1.5%) | |
-1 | 1 (0.4%) | |
0 | 38 (14.4%) | |
1 | 20 (7.6%) | |
2 | 37 (14.1%) | |
3 | 53 (20.2%) | |
4 | 44 (16.7%) | |
5 | 64 (24.3%) |
Preview button on comment quick reply
Mean: 2.93 Median: 3 Std. Dev 1.94
-5 | 0 (0.0%) | |
---|---|---|
-4 | 0 (0.0%) | |
-3 | 0 (0.0%) | |
-2 | 0 (0.0%) | |
-1 | 1 (0.4%) | |
0 | 54 (20.8%) | |
1 | 14 (5.4%) | |
2 | 31 (12.0%) | |
3 | 40 (15.4%) | |
4 | 30 (11.6%) | |
5 | 89 (34.4%) |
Improved NSFW/adult content warnings, like the ability to add a description
Mean: 2.71 Median: 3 Std. Dev 1.85
-5 | 0 (0.0%) | |
---|---|---|
-4 | 0 (0.0%) | |
-3 | 1 (0.4%) | |
-2 | 0 (0.0%) | |
-1 | 2 (0.8%) | |
0 | 50 (19.1%) | |
1 | 19 (7.3%) | |
2 | 38 (14.5%) | |
3 | 51 (19.5%) | |
4 | 39 (14.9%) | |
5 | 62 (23.7%) |
Removal of adult content flagging
Mean: 3.09 Median: 4 Std. Dev 2.16
-5 | 2 (0.8%) | |
---|---|---|
-4 | 1 (0.4%) | |
-3 | 1 (0.4%) | |
-2 | 3 (1.1%) | |
-1 | 1 (0.4%) | |
0 | 44 (16.8%) | |
1 | 12 (4.6%) | |
2 | 18 (6.9%) | |
3 | 40 (15.3%) | |
4 | 35 (13.4%) | |
5 | 105 (40.1%) |
A variety of site scheme choices
Mean: 2.93 Median: 3 Std. Dev 1.78
-5 | 0 (0.0%) | |
---|---|---|
-4 | 0 (0.0%) | |
-3 | 3 (1.2%) | |
-2 | 1 (0.4%) | |
-1 | 1 (0.4%) | |
0 | 29 (11.2%) | |
1 | 19 (7.3%) | |
2 | 36 (13.9%) | |
3 | 65 (25.1%) | |
4 | 40 (15.4%) | |
5 | 65 (25.1%) |
Ability to link to users on other sites
Mean: 3.93 Median: 4 Std. Dev 1.35
-5 | 0 (0.0%) | |
---|---|---|
-4 | 0 (0.0%) | |
-3 | 0 (0.0%) | |
-2 | 0 (0.0%) | |
-1 | 0 (0.0%) | |
0 | 7 (2.7%) | |
1 | 11 (4.2%) | |
2 | 24 (9.2%) | |
3 | 39 (14.9%) | |
4 | 51 (19.5%) | |
5 | 130 (49.6%) |
Respect post cuts in RSS feeds
Mean: 3.05 Median: 4 Std. Dev 2.09
-5 | 2 (0.8%) | |
---|---|---|
-4 | 0 (0.0%) | |
-3 | 2 (0.8%) | |
-2 | 1 (0.4%) | |
-1 | 2 (0.8%) | |
0 | 43 (16.8%) | |
1 | 10 (3.9%) | |
2 | 23 (9.0%) | |
3 | 41 (16.0%) | |
4 | 39 (15.2%) | |
5 | 93 (36.3%) |
No word count limit on interests
Mean: 2.63 Median: 3 Std. Dev 2.12
-5 | 3 (1.2%) | |
---|---|---|
-4 | 0 (0.0%) | |
-3 | 1 (0.4%) | |
-2 | 3 (1.2%) | |
-1 | 1 (0.4%) | |
0 | 50 (19.2%) | |
1 | 22 (8.5%) | |
2 | 27 (10.4%) | |
3 | 51 (19.6%) | |
4 | 30 (11.5%) | |
5 | 72 (27.7%) |
Added "other" to the gender options
Mean: 3.37 Median: 4 Std. Dev 1.92
-5 | 0 (0.0%) | |
---|---|---|
-4 | 0 (0.0%) | |
-3 | 0 (0.0%) | |
-2 | 1 (0.4%) | |
-1 | 2 (0.8%) | |
0 | 39 (14.8%) | |
1 | 14 (5.3%) | |
2 | 20 (7.6%) | |
3 | 33 (12.5%) | |
4 | 32 (12.2%) | |
5 | 122 (46.4%) |
Removal of nudge
Mean: 2.59 Median: 3 Std. Dev 2.34
-5 | 3 (1.1%) | |
---|---|---|
-4 | 2 (0.8%) | |
-3 | 0 (0.0%) | |
-2 | 0 (0.0%) | |
-1 | 3 (1.1%) | |
0 | 71 (27.2%) | |
1 | 14 (5.4%) | |
2 | 28 (10.7%) | |
3 | 25 (9.6%) | |
4 | 17 (6.5%) | |
5 | 98 (37.5%) |
Removal of Snap.com popups
Mean: 3.89 Median: 5 Std. Dev 1.87
-5 | 2 (0.8%) | |
---|---|---|
-4 | 0 (0.0%) | |
-3 | 0 (0.0%) | |
-2 | 0 (0.0%) | |
-1 | 0 (0.0%) | |
0 | 27 (10.3%) | |
1 | 10 (3.8%) | |
2 | 13 (5.0%) | |
3 | 16 (6.1%) | |
4 | 25 (9.5%) | |
5 | 169 (64.5%) |
Cleaning up of the codebase; ability to run my own installation
Mean: 1.83 Median: 1 Std. Dev 1.93
-5 | 0 (0.0%) | |
---|---|---|
-4 | 0 (0.0%) | |
-3 | 0 (0.0%) | |
-2 | 0 (0.0%) | |
-1 | 1 (0.4%) | |
0 | 110 (42.5%) | |
1 | 25 (9.7%) | |
2 | 23 (8.9%) | |
3 | 40 (15.4%) | |
4 | 17 (6.6%) | |
5 | 43 (16.6%) |
Favorite open beta feature
STOP!
Enter your answers for the above poll first if you have already filled it out!For more information or discussion about these planned features, please see these posts:
Main/alternate account system
Draft and scheduled posts
Redesigned photo hosting
Complete memories overhaul
Better notification inbox filtering
Community maintainers able to add LJ cuts, increase the security level, or add adult content warning
Export journal as a PDF
Download poll results to CSV
User to user classified system
Archive pages
Killfiles
Address book
Splitting up maintainer and moderator capabilities into smaller chunks
Community chatrooms in DWTalk
IM to DW chat log converter
Ways to subscribe to only certain posts of other users
Improved to do list
Main/alternate account system
Mean: 3.13 Median: 3 Std. Dev 1.77
-5 | 0 (0.0%) | |
---|---|---|
-4 | 0 (0.0%) | |
-3 | 0 (0.0%) | |
-2 | 0 (0.0%) | |
-1 | 0 (0.0%) | |
0 | 32 (14.7%) | |
1 | 14 (6.4%) | |
2 | 23 (10.6%) | |
3 | 45 (20.6%) | |
4 | 33 (15.1%) | |
5 | 71 (32.6%) |
Draft and scheduled posts
Mean: 3.28 Median: 4 Std. Dev 1.66
-5 | 0 (0.0%) | |
---|---|---|
-4 | 0 (0.0%) | |
-3 | 0 (0.0%) | |
-2 | 1 (0.5%) | |
-1 | 0 (0.0%) | |
0 | 21 (9.6%) | |
1 | 14 (6.4%) | |
2 | 26 (11.9%) | |
3 | 42 (19.3%) | |
4 | 45 (20.6%) | |
5 | 69 (31.7%) |
Redesigned photo hosting
Mean: 2.50 Median: 3 Std. Dev 1.93
-5 | 0 (0.0%) | |
---|---|---|
-4 | 0 (0.0%) | |
-3 | 0 (0.0%) | |
-2 | 2 (0.9%) | |
-1 | 0 (0.0%) | |
0 | 55 (25.1%) | |
1 | 17 (7.8%) | |
2 | 29 (13.2%) | |
3 | 37 (16.9%) | |
4 | 29 (13.2%) | |
5 | 50 (22.8%) |
Complete memories overhaul
Mean: 2.93 Median: 3 Std. Dev 1.95
-5 | 1 (0.5%) | |
---|---|---|
-4 | 0 (0.0%) | |
-3 | 0 (0.0%) | |
-2 | 0 (0.0%) | |
-1 | 5 (2.3%) | |
0 | 36 (16.4%) | |
1 | 12 (5.5%) | |
2 | 21 (9.6%) | |
3 | 45 (20.5%) | |
4 | 33 (15.1%) | |
5 | 66 (30.1%) |
Better notification inbox filtering
Mean: 3.05 Median: 3 Std. Dev 1.65
-5 | 0 (0.0%) | |
---|---|---|
-4 | 0 (0.0%) | |
-3 | 0 (0.0%) | |
-2 | 0 (0.0%) | |
-1 | 1 (0.5%) | |
0 | 22 (10.0%) | |
1 | 24 (11.0%) | |
2 | 24 (11.0%) | |
3 | 52 (23.7%) | |
4 | 40 (18.3%) | |
5 | 56 (25.6%) |
Community maintainers able to add LJ cuts, increase the security level, or add adult content warnings to posts in their community
Mean: 3.77 Median: 4 Std. Dev 1.53
-5 | 0 (0.0%) | |
---|---|---|
-4 | 0 (0.0%) | |
-3 | 0 (0.0%) | |
-2 | 1 (0.5%) | |
-1 | 1 (0.5%) | |
0 | 10 (4.6%) | |
1 | 11 (5.0%) | |
2 | 14 (6.4%) | |
3 | 41 (18.8%) | |
4 | 37 (17.0%) | |
5 | 103 (47.2%) |
Export journal as a PDF
Mean: 2.39 Median: 2.5 Std. Dev 2.15
-5 | 0 (0.0%) | |
---|---|---|
-4 | 1 (0.5%) | |
-3 | 1 (0.5%) | |
-2 | 2 (0.9%) | |
-1 | 3 (1.4%) | |
0 | 62 (28.4%) | |
1 | 15 (6.9%) | |
2 | 25 (11.5%) | |
3 | 27 (12.4%) | |
4 | 22 (10.1%) | |
5 | 60 (27.5%) |
Download poll results to CSV
Mean: 1.68 Median: 1 Std. Dev 1.82
-5 | 0 (0.0%) | |
---|---|---|
-4 | 0 (0.0%) | |
-3 | 0 (0.0%) | |
-2 | 1 (0.5%) | |
-1 | 0 (0.0%) | |
0 | 96 (44.0%) | |
1 | 19 (8.7%) | |
2 | 25 (11.5%) | |
3 | 32 (14.7%) | |
4 | 22 (10.1%) | |
5 | 23 (10.6%) |
User to user classified system
Mean: 0.33 Median: 0 Std. Dev 2.10
-5 | 8 (3.7%) | |
---|---|---|
-4 | 3 (1.4%) | |
-3 | 9 (4.2%) | |
-2 | 9 (4.2%) | |
-1 | 17 (7.9%) | |
0 | 98 (45.8%) | |
1 | 15 (7.0%) | |
2 | 18 (8.4%) | |
3 | 21 (9.8%) | |
4 | 10 (4.7%) | |
5 | 6 (2.8%) |
Archive pages
Mean: 2.06 Median: 2 Std. Dev 1.88
-5 | 0 (0.0%) | |
---|---|---|
-4 | 0 (0.0%) | |
-3 | 1 (0.5%) | |
-2 | 3 (1.4%) | |
-1 | 3 (1.4%) | |
0 | 57 (27.3%) | |
1 | 22 (10.5%) | |
2 | 29 (13.9%) | |
3 | 43 (20.6%) | |
4 | 22 (10.5%) | |
5 | 29 (13.9%) |
Killfiles
Mean: 2.34 Median: 3 Std. Dev 2.26
-5 | 4 (1.8%) | |
---|---|---|
-4 | 0 (0.0%) | |
-3 | 3 (1.4%) | |
-2 | 2 (0.9%) | |
-1 | 4 (1.8%) | |
0 | 47 (21.5%) | |
1 | 16 (7.3%) | |
2 | 23 (10.5%) | |
3 | 44 (20.1%) | |
4 | 25 (11.4%) | |
5 | 51 (23.3%) |
Address book
Mean: 1.55 Median: 1 Std. Dev 2.00
-5 | 3 (1.4%) | |
---|---|---|
-4 | 1 (0.5%) | |
-3 | 1 (0.5%) | |
-2 | 1 (0.5%) | |
-1 | 3 (1.4%) | |
0 | 80 (37.6%) | |
1 | 26 (12.2%) | |
2 | 23 (10.8%) | |
3 | 34 (16.0%) | |
4 | 21 (9.9%) | |
5 | 20 (9.4%) |
Splitting up maintainer and moderator capabilities into smaller chunks
Mean: 2.90 Median: 3 Std. Dev 1.87
-5 | 1 (0.5%) | |
---|---|---|
-4 | 0 (0.0%) | |
-3 | 0 (0.0%) | |
-2 | 0 (0.0%) | |
-1 | 1 (0.5%) | |
0 | 30 (13.8%) | |
1 | 26 (11.9%) | |
2 | 24 (11.0%) | |
3 | 45 (20.6%) | |
4 | 26 (11.9%) | |
5 | 65 (29.8%) |
Community chatrooms in DWTalk
Mean: 1.18 Median: 0 Std. Dev 2.08
-5 | 5 (2.3%) | |
---|---|---|
-4 | 0 (0.0%) | |
-3 | 3 (1.4%) | |
-2 | 5 (2.3%) | |
-1 | 6 (2.8%) | |
0 | 90 (42.3%) | |
1 | 18 (8.5%) | |
2 | 22 (10.3%) | |
3 | 32 (15.0%) | |
4 | 17 (8.0%) | |
5 | 15 (7.0%) |
IM to DW chat log converter
Mean: 1.36 Median: 1 Std. Dev 2.15
-5 | 5 (2.3%) | |
---|---|---|
-4 | 1 (0.5%) | |
-3 | 4 (1.9%) | |
-2 | 1 (0.5%) | |
-1 | 5 (2.3%) | |
0 | 83 (38.6%) | |
1 | 19 (8.8%) | |
2 | 29 (13.5%) | |
3 | 29 (13.5%) | |
4 | 18 (8.4%) | |
5 | 21 (9.8%) |
Ways to subscribe to only certain posts of other users
Mean: 3.40 Median: 4 Std. Dev 1.67
-5 | 0 (0.0%) | |
---|---|---|
-4 | 0 (0.0%) | |
-3 | 0 (0.0%) | |
-2 | 0 (0.0%) | |
-1 | 3 (1.4%) | |
0 | 20 (9.2%) | |
1 | 8 (3.7%) | |
2 | 21 (9.7%) | |
3 | 52 (24.0%) | |
4 | 31 (14.3%) | |
5 | 82 (37.8%) |
Improved to do list
Mean: 1.46 Median: 1 Std. Dev 1.88
-5 | 1 (0.5%) | |
---|---|---|
-4 | 0 (0.0%) | |
-3 | 0 (0.0%) | |
-2 | 1 (0.5%) | |
-1 | 5 (2.3%) | |
0 | 99 (45.8%) | |
1 | 17 (7.9%) | |
2 | 30 (13.9%) | |
3 | 28 (13.0%) | |
4 | 8 (3.7%) | |
5 | 27 (12.5%) |
Favorite planned feature
Added "other" to the gender options
Date: 2009-04-21 05:12 am (UTC)Re: Added "other" to the gender options
Date: 2009-04-21 10:59 am (UTC)Re: Added "other" to the gender options
From:Removal of nudge
Date: 2009-04-21 05:12 am (UTC)Re: Removal of nudge
Date: 2009-04-21 05:15 am (UTC)Re: Removal of nudge
From:Re: Removal of nudge
From:Re: Removal of nudge
From:Re: Removal of nudge
From:Re: Removal of nudge
From:Re: Removal of nudge
From:Removal of Snap.com popups
Date: 2009-04-21 05:13 am (UTC)Re: Removal of Snap.com popups
Date: 2009-04-21 08:58 am (UTC)Oh, snap.com, why did anyone ever think you were a good idea?
Re: Removal of Snap.com popups
From:Re: Removal of Snap.com popups
From:Re: Removal of Snap.com popups
From:Re: Removal of Snap.com popups
From:Re: Removal of Snap.com popups
From:Re: Removal of Snap.com popups
From:Cleaning up of the codebase; ability to run my own installation
Date: 2009-04-21 05:24 am (UTC)Re: Cleaning up of the codebase; ability to run my own installation
Date: 2009-04-21 04:44 pm (UTC)Re: Cleaning up of the codebase; ability to run my own installation
From:Re: Cleaning up of the codebase; ability to run my own installation
From:Main/alternate account system
Date: 2009-04-21 06:46 am (UTC)Re: Main/alternate account system
Date: 2009-04-21 11:02 am (UTC)Re: Main/alternate account system
From:Re: Main/alternate account system
From:Re: Main/alternate account system
From:Re: Main/alternate account system
From:Draft and scheduled posts
Date: 2009-04-21 06:48 am (UTC)Scheduled posts:
Re: Main/alternate account system
Date: 2009-04-21 09:59 am (UTC)Re: Main/alternate account system
From:Re: Draft and scheduled posts
From:Re: Draft and scheduled posts
From:Re: Draft and scheduled posts
From:Redesigned photo hosting
Date: 2009-04-21 06:49 am (UTC)Re: Redesigned photo hosting
Date: 2009-04-21 11:06 am (UTC)Re: Redesigned photo hosting
From:Re: Redesigned photo hosting
From:Re: Redesigned photo hosting
From:Re: Redesigned photo hosting
From:Re: Redesigned photo hosting
From:Re: Redesigned photo hosting
From:Complete memories overhaul
Date: 2009-04-21 06:51 am (UTC)Users will also be able to bookmark comments and offsite links.
Re: Complete memories overhaul
Date: 2009-04-21 11:52 am (UTC)Re: Complete memories overhaul
From:Re: Complete memories overhaul
From:Re: Complete memories overhaul
From:Re: Complete memories overhaul
From:Re: Complete memories overhaul
From:Better notification inbox filtering
Date: 2009-04-21 06:54 am (UTC)Re: Better notification inbox filtering
Date: 2009-04-21 01:43 pm (UTC)Re: Better notification inbox filtering
From:Re: Better notification inbox filtering
From:Re: Better notification inbox filtering
From:Community maintainers able to add LJ cuts, increase the security level, or add adult content warning
Date: 2009-04-21 06:55 am (UTC)Re: Community maintainers able to add LJ cuts, increase the security level, or add adult content war
Date: 2009-04-21 07:59 pm (UTC)Export journal as a PDF
Date: 2009-04-21 06:57 am (UTC)Re: Export journal as a PDF
Date: 2009-04-21 01:02 pm (UTC)Re: Export journal as a PDF
From:Re: Export journal as a PDF
From:Download poll results to CSV
Date: 2009-04-21 06:59 am (UTC)Re: Download poll results to CSV
Date: 2009-04-21 08:01 pm (UTC)For me the most frustrating part of polls on lj is being unable to look at the poll data in a way that I can easily sort and filter to see correlations and trends and such. (Yes, I am an excel geek).
Re: Download poll results to CSV
From:User to user classified system
Date: 2009-04-21 07:00 am (UTC)Re: User to user classified system
Date: 2009-04-21 11:09 am (UTC)Re: User to user classified system
From:Re: User to user classified system
From:Archive pages
Date: 2009-04-21 07:01 am (UTC)Re: User to user classified system
Date: 2009-04-22 02:57 am (UTC)Re: User to user classified system
From:auto-archive
From:Re: User to user classified system
From:Re: User to user classified system
From:Re: Archive pages
From:Killfiles
Date: 2009-04-21 07:03 am (UTC)Re: Killfiles
Date: 2009-04-21 11:11 am (UTC)Re: Killfiles
From:Killfiles
From:Re: Killfiles
From:Re: Killfiles
From:Re: Killfiles
From:Re: Killfiles
From:Re: Killfiles
From:Re: Killfiles
From:Address book
Date: 2009-04-21 07:05 am (UTC)Re: Address book
Date: 2009-04-22 03:11 am (UTC)Splitting up maintainer and moderator capabilities into smaller chunks
Date: 2009-04-21 07:07 am (UTC)Re: Splitting up maintainer and moderator capabilities into smaller chunks
Date: 2009-04-21 01:45 pm (UTC)Re: Splitting up maintainer and moderator capabilities into smaller chunks
From:Community chatrooms in DWTalk
Date: 2009-04-21 07:08 am (UTC)IM to DW chat log converter
Date: 2009-04-21 07:09 am (UTC)Re: IM to DW chat log converter
Date: 2009-04-21 09:08 pm (UTC)Re: IM to DW chat log converter
From:Re: IM to DW chat log converter
From:Re: IM to DW chat log converter
From:Re: IM to DW chat log converter
From:Re: IM to DW chat log converter
From:Re: IM to DW chat log converter
From:Ways to subscribe to only certain posts of other users
Date: 2009-04-21 07:11 am (UTC)* Opt in filters. That is, one of your access filters is public and people can opt themselves in or out of it, so you don't have to manage it.
* Subscribe to tags. This will let you subscribe, or not subscribe, to posts from an account containing a certain tag.
Re: Ways to subscribe to only certain posts of other users
Date: 2009-04-21 01:47 pm (UTC)Re: Ways to subscribe to only certain posts of other users
From:Re: Ways to subscribe to only certain posts of other users
From:Re: Ways to subscribe to only certain posts of other users
From:Re: Ways to subscribe to only certain posts of other users
From:Improved to do list
Date: 2009-04-21 07:12 am (UTC)Re: Improved to do list
Date: 2009-04-22 03:36 pm (UTC)Re: Improved to do list
From:Reorganized menu structure
Date: 2009-04-21 07:13 am (UTC)Re: Reorganized menu structure
Date: 2009-04-21 09:09 am (UTC)Re: Reorganized menu structure
From:Re: Reorganized menu structure
From:no subject
Date: 2009-04-21 02:49 pm (UTC)And now I'm wondering -- is the thing where we get a mean, a median, and an SD on polls a new feature, or have LJ polls been doing that for years and I just never noticed?
no subject
Date: 2009-04-21 03:07 pm (UTC)no subject
Date: 2009-04-21 07:02 pm (UTC)But you almost certainly know this already; I just wanted to make it clear.
no subject
Date: 2009-04-21 07:09 pm (UTC)And people are free to spread this poll far and wide.
(no subject)
From:no subject
Date: 2009-04-21 08:41 pm (UTC)One thing I'd like, as a programmer, is the ability to upload PDF, Word, OpenDoccument, and text files as well as images. I like to be able to post source code in a downloadable format. I'm not sure that allowing us to upload executables is a good idea, at least for free users. Paid/permanent/seed users might be a bit more trustworthy.
no subject
Date: 2009-04-22 07:12 pm (UTC)Another factor of ads is in the way it affects design and business decisions; this can affect the paid/permanent user experience as well, as features designed to encourage advertising and sponsorship revenue might be suboptimal if only considering user needs. This is another reason why people might dislike ads on a service, even if they never see them.
(no subject)
From:(no subject)
From: